Skip Navigation

Biometrika 2008 95(2):295-305; doi:10.1093/biomet/asn013
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Buyske, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 Biometrika Trust

Articles

A family of Bayes multiple testing procedures

Arthur Cohen, H. B. Sackrowitz, Minya Xu and Steven Buyske

Department of Statistics, and Biostatistics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-8019, U.S.A. artcohen{at}rci.rutgers.edu sackrowi{at}rci.rutgers.edu minyaxu{at}eden.rutgers.edu buyske{at}stat.rutgers.edu

Received for publication 1 July 2007. Revision received 1 September 2007.
   Abstract

Under the model of independent test statistics, we propose a two-parameter family of Bayes multiple testing procedures. The two parameters can be viewed as tuning parameters. Using the Benjamini–Hochberg step-up procedure for controlling false discovery rate as a baseline for conservativeness, we choose the tuning parameters to compromise between the operating characteristics of that procedure and a less conservative procedure that focuses on alternatives that a priori might be considered likely or meaningful. The Bayes procedures do not have the theoretical and practical shortcomings of the popular stepwise procedures. In terms of the number of mistakes, simulations for two examples indicate that over a large segment of the parameter space, the Bayes procedure is preferable to the step-up procedure. Another desirable feature of the procedures is that they are computationally feasible for any number of hypotheses.

Key Words: False discovery rate • Familywise error rate • Genomics • Noncentral chi-squared density • Noncentral t density • Step-down procedure • Step-up procedure


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.