Skip Navigation

Biometrika 2006 93(1):41-52; doi:10.1093/biomet/93.1.41
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bartolucci, F.
Right arrow Articles by Mira, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 Biometrika Trust

Efficient Bayes factor estimation from the reversible jump output

Francesco Bartolucci1, Luisa Scaccia2 and Antonietta Mira3

1 Department of Economics, Finance and Statistics, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy bart{at}stat.unipg.it, 2 Department of Economic and Financial Institutions, University of Macerata, 62100 Macerata, Italy scaccia{at}unimc.it, 3 Department of Economics, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy antonietta.mira{at}uninsubria.it

We propose a class of estimators of the Bayes factor which is based on an extension of the bridge sampling identity of Meng & Wong (1996) and makes use of the output of the reversible jump algorithm of Green (1995). Within this class we give the optimal estimator and also a suboptimal one which may be simply computed on the basis of the acceptance probabilities used within the reversible jump algorithm for jumping between models. The proposed estimators are very easily computed and lead to a substantial gain of efficiency in estimating the Bayes factor over the standard estimator based on the reversible jump output. This is illustrated through a series of Monte Carlo simulations involving a linear and a logistic regression model.

Key Words: Bayesian model choice; Bridge sampling; Marginal likelihood; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Reversible jump


Received September 2004. Revised September 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.