Biometrika Advance Access published online on November 19, 2007
Biometrika, doi:10.1093/biomet/asm067
Articles |
Hochberg's step-up method: cutting corners off Holm's step-down method
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33612, U.S.A. yifan.huang{at}moffitt.org
Department of Statistics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, U.S.A. jch{at}stat.ohio-state.edu
Received for publication 1 April 2006. Revision received 1 March 2007.
Holm's method and Hochberg's method for multiple testing can be viewed as step-down and step-up versions of the Bonferroni test. We show that both are special cases of partition testing. The difference is that, while Holm's method tests each partition hypothesis using the largest order statistic, setting a critical value based on the Bonferroni inequality, Hochberg's method tests each partition hypothesis using all the order statistics, setting a series of critical values based on Simes' inequality. Geometrically, Hochberg's step-up method cuts corners off the acceptance regions of Holm's step-down method by making assumptions on the joint distribution of the test statistics. As can be expected, partition testing making use of the joint distribution of the test statistics is more powerful than partition testing using probabilistic inequalities. Thus, if the joint distribution of the test statistics is available, through modelling for example, we recommend partition step-down testing, setting exact critical values based on the joint distribution.
Key Words: Hochberg's method Holm's method Multiple testing Partition testing Step-down test Step-up test
References
-
Finner H., Roters M. On the false discovery rate and expected Type I errors. Biomet. J. (2001) 43:985–1005.[CrossRef]
Finner H., Strassburger K. The partitioning principle: a powerful tool in multiple decision theory. Ann. Statist. (2002) 30:1194–213.[CrossRef]
Graybill F. A. Matrices with Applications in Statistics (1983) 2nd. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Hayter A. J., Hsu J. C. On the relationship between stepwise decision procedures and confidence sets. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. (1994) 89:128–36.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Hochberg Y. A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika (1988) 75:800–2.
Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Statist. (1979) 6:65–70.
Hommel G. A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test. Biometrika (1988) 75:383–6.
Hsu J. C. Multiple Comparisons: Theory and Methods (1996) London: Chapman and Hall.
Karlin S., Rinott Y. Total positivity properties of absolute value multinormal variables with applications to confidence interval estimation and related probabilistic inequalities. Ann. Statist. (1981) 9:1035–49.[CrossRef]
Paty D., Li D. Interferon beta-1b is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. II. MRI analysis results of a multicenter, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology (1993) 43:662–6.
Sarkar S. Some probability inequalities for ordered MTP2 random variables: A proof of the Simes conjecture. Ann. Statist. (1998) 26:494–504.[CrossRef]
Simes R. J. An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika (1986) 73:751–4.
Stefansson G., Kim W., Hsu J. C. On confidence sets in multiple comparisons. In: Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics IV—Gupta S. S., Berger J. O., eds. (1988) volume 2. New York: Springer Verlag. 89–104.
The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. Interferon beta-1b is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. I. Clinical results of a multicenter, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology (1993) 43:655–61.
The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. Interferon beta-1b in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: Final outcome of the randomised, controlled trial. Neurology (1995) 45:1277–85.
van der Laan M. J., Dudoit S., Pollard K. S. Multiple testing. part ii. step-down procedures for control of the family-wise error rate. Statist. Applic. Genet. Molec. Biol. (2004) 3. http://www.bepress.com/sagmb/vol3/iss1/art14.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||