Skip Navigation


Biometrika Advance Access originally published online on April 7, 2009
Biometrika 2009 96(2):457-468; doi:10.1093/biomet/asp003
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lohr, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, J. N. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2009 Biometrika Trust

Article

Jackknife estimation of mean squared error of small area predictors in nonlinear mixed models

Sharon L. Lohr

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-1804, U.S.A. sharon.lohr{at}asu.edu

J. N. K. Rao

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada jrao{at}math.carleton.ca

Received for publication 1 October 2007. Revision received 1 August 2008.

Empirical Bayes predictors of small area parameters of interest are often obtained under a linear mixed model for continuous response data or a generalized linear mixed model for binary responses or count data. However, estimation of the unconditional mean squared error of prediction is complicated, particularly for a nonlinear mixed model. Jiang et al. (2002) proposed a jackknife method for estimating the unconditional mean squared error and showed that the resulting estimator is nearly unbiased. The leading term of this estimator does not depend on the area-specific responses in the nonlinear case, whereas the posterior variance of the small area parameter given the model parameters is area-specific. Rao (2003) proposed an alternative method that leads to a computationally simpler jackknife estimator with an area-specific leading term. We show that a modification of Rao's method leads to a nearly unbiased area-specific jackknife estimator, which is also nearly unbiased for the conditional mean squared error given the area-specific responses. We examine the relative performances of the jackknife estimators, conditionally as well as unconditionally, in a simulation study, and apply the proposed method to estimate small area mean squared errors in disease mapping problems.

Key Words: Area-specific • Beta-binomial model • Binary response • Disease mapping • Empirical Bayes • Generalized linear mixed model



References

    Booth J. G., Hobert J. P. Standard errors of prediction in generalized linear mixed models. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. (1998) 93:262–72.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Breslow N. E., Clayton D. G. Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. (1993) 88:9–25.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Clayton D., Kaldor J. Empirical Bayes estimates of age-standardized relative risks for use in disease mapping. Biometrics (1987) 43:671–81.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Datta G. S., Rao J. N. K., Smith D. D. On measuring the variability of small area estimators under a basic area level model. Biometrika (2005) 92:183–96.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Fay R. E., Herriot R. A. Estimates of income for small places: an application of James-Stein procedures to census data. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. (1979) 74:269–77.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Fuller W. A. Prediction of true values for the measurement error model. Statistical Analysis of Measurement Error Models and Applications—Brown P. J., Fuller W. A., eds. (1990) 112. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. 41–57. Contemporary Mathematics.

    Hoadley B. Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators for the independent not identically distributed case. Ann. Math. Statist. (1971) 42:1977–91.[CrossRef]

    Householder A. S. The Numerical Treatment of a Single Nonlinear Equation (1970) New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Jiang J., Lahiri P., Wan S.-M. A unified jackknife theory for empirical best prediction with M-estimation. Ann. Statist. (2002) 30:1782–810.[CrossRef]

    Kleinman J. C. Proportions with extraneous variance: single and independent samples. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. (1973) 68:46–54.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Lohr S. Discussion of papers on resampling methods in small area estimation. Proc. Survey Res. Meth. Sect. Am. Statist. Assoc. (2007) Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. 3265–7.

    Longford N. On standard errors of model-based small area estimators. Survey Methodol. (2007) 33:69–79.

    Quenouille M. H. Notes on bias in estimation. Biometrika (1956) 43:353–60.[Free Full Text]

    Rao J. N. K. Small Area Estimation (2003) New York: Wiley.

    R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (2008) Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

    Smith D. M. Algorithm AS 189: Maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters of the beta binomial distribution. Appl. Statist. (1983) 32:196–204.[CrossRef]

    Wakefield J. Disease mapping and spatial regression with count data. Biostatistics (2007) 8:158–83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lohr, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, J. N. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?