Skip Navigation

Biometrika 2009 96(1):237-242; doi:10.1093/biomet/asn063
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jeong, J.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Fine, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2009 Biometrika Trust

Articles

A note on cause-specific residual life

J.-H. Jeong

Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, U.S.A. jeong{at}nsabp.pitt.edu

J. P. Fine

Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, U.S.A. jfine{at}bios.unc.edu

Received for publication 1 September 2008. Revision received 1 October 2008.

In medical research, investigators often wish to characterize the distributions of remaining lifetimes. While nonparametric analyses of residual life distributions have been widely studied with independently right-censored data, residual life analysis has not been examined in the competing risks setting, with multiple, potentially dependent, failure types. We define the cause-specific residual life distribution as the residual cumulative incidence function conditionally on survival to a given time. Because of the improper form of the cause-specific distribution, the mean cause-specific residual lifetime does not exist, theoretically. We develop nonparametric inferences for the cause-specific residual life function and its corresponding quantiles, which may exist. Theoretical justification, including uniform consistency and weak convergence, is established. Simulation studies and a breast cancer data analysis demonstrate the practical utility of the methods.

Key Words: Conditional cumulative incidence function • Dependent censoring • Empirical process • Pivotal statistic • Quantile residual life



References

    Aalen O. Nonparametric inference for family of counting processes. Ann. Statist. (1978) 6:701–26.[CrossRef]

    Alam K., Kulasekera K. B. Estimation of the quantile function of residual life time distribution. J. Statist. Plan. Infer. (1993) 37:327–37.[CrossRef]

    Andersen P. K., Borgan O., Gill R. D., Keiding N. Statistical Models Based on Counting Processes (1993) New York: Springer.

    Berger R. L., Boos D. D., Guess F. M. Tests and confidence sets for comparing two mean residual life functions. Biometrics (1988) 44:103–15.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Fisher B., Jeong J., Anderson S., Bryant J., Fisher E. R., Wolmark N. Twenty-five year findings from a randomized clinical trial comparing radical mastectomy with total mastectomy and with total mastectomy followed by radiation therapy. New Engl. J. Med. (2002) 347:567–75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Hall W. J., Wellner J. A. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Statistics and Related Topics. Csorgo M., Dawson D. A., Rao J. N. K., Saleh A. K. Md. E., eds. New York: Elsevier/North Holland. 169–84.

    Jeong J.-H., Fine J. P. Direct parametric inference for cumulative incidence function. Appl. Statist. (2006) 55:187–200.

    Jeong J.-H., Fine J. P. Parametric regression on cumulative incidence function. Biostatistics (2007) 8:184–96.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Joe H., Proschan F. Percentile residual life functions. Oper. Res. (1984) 32:668–78.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Kaplan E. L., Meier P. Nonparametric estimator from incomplete observations. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. (1958) 53:457–81.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Peng L., Fine J. P. Nonparametric quantile inference with competing-risks data. Biometrika (2007) 94:735–44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Pepe M. S. Inference for events with dependent risks in multiple endpoint studies. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. (1991) 86:770–8.[CrossRef][Web of Science]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jeong, J.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Fine, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?