Skip Navigation

Biometrika 2008 95(4):831-845; doi:10.1093/biomet/asn045
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guan, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 Biometrika Trust

Articles

A goodness-of-fit test for inhomogeneous spatial Poisson processes

Yongtao Guan

Division of Biostatistics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8034, U.S.A. yongtao.guan{at}yale.edu

Received for publication 1 April 2007. Revision received 1 March 2008.

We introduce a formal testing procedure to assess the fit of an inhomogeneous spatial Poisson process model, based on a discrepancy measure function Formula that is constructed from residuals obtained from the fitted model. We derive the asymptotic distributional properties of Formula and develop a test statistic based on them. Our test statistic has a limiting standard normal distribution, so that the test can be performed by simply comparing the test statistic with readily available critical values. We perform a simulation study to assess the performance of the proposed method and apply it to a real data example.

Key Words: Goodness-of-fit test • Inhomogeneous spatial Poisson process • Residual diagnostic



References

    Baddeley A. J., Møller J., Pakes A. G. Properties of residuals for spatial point processes. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. (2008) 60:629–49.

    Baddeley A. J., Møller J., Waagepetersen R. Non- and semi-parametric estimation of interaction in inhomogeneous point patterns. Statist. Neerlandica (2000) 54:329–50.

    Baddeley A. J., Turner R., Møller J., Hazelton M. Residual analysis for spatial point processes (with Discussion). J. R. Statist. Soc. B (2005) 67:617–66.

    Berman M., Turner R. T. Approximating point process likelihoods with GLIM. Appl. Stat. (1992) 41:31–8.[CrossRef]

    Besag J. Contribution to the discussion of a paper by B. D. Ripley. J. R. Statist. Soc. B (1977) 39:193–5.

    Brix A., Senoussi R., Couteron P., Chaduf J. Assessing goodness-of-fit of spatially inhomogeneous Poisson processes. Biometrika (2001) 88:487–97.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Cressie N. A. C. Statistics for Spatial Data (1993) New York: Wiley.

    Daley D., Vere-Jones D. An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes (1988) New York: Springer.

    Diggle P. J. A point process modelling approach to raised incidence of a rare phenomenon in the vicinity of a prespecified point. J. R. Statist. Soc. A (1990) 153:349–62.

    Diggle P. J. Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns (2003) 2nd ed. London: Arnold.

    Diggle P. J., Rowlingson B. S. A conditional approach to point process modeling of elevated risk. J. R. Statist. Soc. A (1994) 157:433–40.[CrossRef]

    Ho L. P., Chiu S. N. Testing uniformity of a spatial point pattern. J. Comput. Graph. Statist. (2007) 16:378–98.

    Illian J. B., Møller J., Waagepetersen R. Hierarchical spatial point process analysis for a plant community with high biodiversity. Environ. Ecol. Stat. (2008) doi: 10.1007/s10651-007-0070-8.

    Kulldorff M. Spatial scan statistics: Models, calculations, and applications. In: Scan Statistics and Applications—Glaz J., Balakrishnan N., eds. (1999) Boston, MA: Birkhäuser. 303–22.

    Kutner M. H., Nachtsheim C. J., Neter J. Applied Linear Regression Models (2004) Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

    Lawson A. B. A deviance residual for heterogeneous spatial Poisson processes. Biometrics (1993) 49:889–97.

    Ogata Y. Statistical models for earthquake occurrences and residual analysis for point processes. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. (1988) 83:9–27.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Rathbun S. L. Estimation of Poisson intensity using partially observed concomitant variables. Biometrics (1996) 52:226–42.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Rathbun S. L., Cressie N. A. C. Asymptotic properties of estimators for the parameters of spatial inhomogeneous Poisson point processes. Adv. in Appl. Probab. (1994) 26:122–54.

    Rathbun S. L., Shiffman S., Gwaltney C. J. Modelling the effects of partially observed covariates on Poisson process intensity. Biometrika (2007) 94:153–65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Ripley B. D. Tests of ‘randomness’ for spatial point patterns. J. R. Statist. Soc. B (1979) 41:368–74.

    Schoenberg F. P. Multidimensional residual analysis of point process models for earthquake occurrences. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. (2003) 98:789–95.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Silverman B. W. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis (1999) New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Waagepetersen R. An estimating function approach to inference for inhomogeneous Neyman–Scott processes. Biometrics (2007) 63:252–8.[Medline]

    Yang J., He H. S., Shifley S. R., Gustafson E. J. Spatial patterns of modern period human-caused fire occurrence in the Missouri Ozark Highlands. Forest Sci. (2007) 53:1–15.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guan, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?