Skip Navigation

Biometrika 2007 94(4):1006-1013; doi:10.1093/biomet/asm073
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pourahmadi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2007 Biometrika Trust

Miscellanea

Cholesky Decompositions and Estimation of A Covariance Matrix: Orthogonality of Variance–Correlation Parameters

Mohsen Pourahmadi

Division of Statistics, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois 60115-2854, U.S.A. pourahm{at}math.niu.edu

Received for publication 1 July 2005. Revision received 1 April 2007.

Chen & Dunson ([3]) have proposed a modified Cholesky decomposition of the form {sigma} = D L L'D for a covariance matrix where D is a diagonal matrix with entries proportional to the square roots of the diagonal entries of {Sigma} and L is a unit lower-triangular matrix solely determining its correlation matrix. This total separation of variance and correlation is definitely a major advantage over the more traditional modified Cholesky decomposition of the form LD2L', (Pourahmadi, [13]). We show that, though the variance and correlation parameters of the former decomposition are separate, they are not asymptotically orthogonal and that the estimation of the new parameters could be more demanding computationally. We also provide statistical interpretation for the entries of L and D as certain moving average parameters and innovation variances and indicate how the existing likelihood procedures can be employed to estimate the new parameters.

Key Words: Maximum likelihood estimation • Moving average coefficient • Positive-definiteness constraint • Unconstrained parameterization • Variance–correlation separation



References

    Barnard J., McCulloch R., Meng X. Modeling covariance matrices in terms of standard deviations and correlations, with applications to shrinkage. Statist. Sinica (2000) 10:1281–312.

    Boik R. J. Spectral models for covariance matrices. Biometrika (2002) 89:159–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Chen Z., Dunson D. Random effects selection in linear mixed models. Biometrics (2003) 59:762–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Cox D. R., Reid N. Parameter orthogonality and approximate conditional inference (with Discussion). J. R. Statist. Soc. B (1987) 49:1–39.

    Dai M., Guo W. Multivariate spectral analysis using Cholesky decomposition. Biometrika (2004) 91:629–43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Daniels M. J., Zhao Y. D. Modelling the random effects covariance matrix in longitudinal data. Statist. Med. (2003) 22:1631–47.[CrossRef]

    Holan S., Spinka C. Joint mean-covariance models for unbalanced repeated measures: Unconstrained parameterization. Statist. Prob. Lett. (2007) 77:319–28.[CrossRef]

    Lindstrom M. J., Bates D. M. Newton-Raphson and EM algorithm for linear mixed-effects models for repeated measures data. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. (1988) 83:1014–22.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Mason R. L., Tracy N. D., Young J. C. Decomposition of T2 for multivariate control chart interpretation. J. Qual. Technol. (1995) 27:99–108.

    Mason R. L., Young J. C. Multivariate Statistical Process Control with Industrial Applications (2002) Philadelphia: SIAM.

    Pan J. X., Mackenzie G. Model selection for joint mean-covariance structures in longitudinal studies. Biometrika (2003) 90:1239–44.

    Pinhiero J., Bates D. M. Unconstrained parametrizations for variance-covariance matrices. Statist. Comp. (1996) 6:289–96.[CrossRef]

    Pourahmadi M. Joint mean-covariance models with applications to longitudinal data: Unconstrained parameterisation. Biometrika (1999) 86:677–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Pourahmadi M. Maximum likelihood estimation of generalised linear models for multivariate normal covariance matrix. Biometrika (2000) 87:425–35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Pourahmadi M. Foundations of Time Series Analysis and Prediction Theory (2001) New York: Wiley.

    Roverato A. Cholesky decomposition of a hyper inverse Wishart matrix. Biometrika (2000) 87:99–112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Smith M, Kohn R. Parsimonious covariance matrix estimation for longitudinal data. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. (2002) 97:1141–53.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Vrontos I. D., Dellaportas P., Politis D. N. A full-factor multivariate GARCH model. Economet. J. (2003) 6:312–34.[CrossRef]

    Ye H., Pan J. Modelling covariance structures in generalised estimating equations for longitudinal data. Biometrika (2006) 93:911–26.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pourahmadi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?