Skip Navigation

Biometrika 2009 96(1):83-93; doi:10.1093/biomet/asn066
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, C.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Tsai, P.-W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2009 Biometrika Trust

Articles

Optimal two-level regular fractional factorial block and split-plot designs

Ching-Shui Cheng

Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, U.S.A. cheng{at}stat.berkeley.edu

Pi-Wen Tsai

Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 11677, Taiwan pwtsai{at}math.ntnu.edu.tw

Received for publication 1 August 2007. Revision received 1 June 2008.
   Abstract

We propose a general and unified approach to the selection of regular fractional factorial designs, which can be applied to experiments that are unblocked, blocked or have a split-plot structure. Our criterion is derived as a good surrogate for the model-robustness criterion of information capacity. In the case of random block effects, it takes the ratio of intra- and interblock variances into account. In most of the cases we have examined, there exist designs that are optimal for all values of that ratio. Examples of optimal designs that depend on the ratio are provided. We also demonstrate that our criterion can further discriminate designs that cannot be distinguished by the existing minimum-aberration criteria.

Key Words: Alias set • Estimation capacity • Information capacity • Minimum aberration • Model robustness • Word length pattern


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.