Skip Navigation


Biometrika Advance Access originally published online on October 22, 2008
Biometrika 2008 95(4):1006-1008; doi:10.1093/biomet/asn044
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/4/1006    most recent
asn044v1
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beyersmann, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schumacher, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 Biometrika Trust

Miscellanea

A note on nonparametric quantile inference for competing risks and more complex multistate models

Jan Beyersmann

Freiburg Centre for Data Analysis and Modelling, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany jan.beyersmann{at}fdm.uni-freiburg.de

Martin Schumacher

Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, University Medical Centre Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany ms{at}imbi.uni-freiburg.de

Received for publication 1 October 2007. Revision received 1 April 2008.
  Abstract

Nonparametric quantile inference for competing risks has recently been studied by Peng & Fine (2007). Their key result establishes uniform consistency and weak convergence of the inverse of the Aalen–Johansen estimator of the cumulative incidence function, using the representation of the cumulative incidence estimator as a sum of independent and identically distributed random variables. The limit process is of a form similar to that of the standard survival result, but with the cause-specific hazard of interest replacing the all-causes hazard. We show that this fact is not a coincidence, but can be derived from a general Hadamard differentiation result. We discuss a simplified proof and extensions of the approach to more complex multistate models. As a further consequence, we find that the bootstrap works.

Key Words: Cumulative incidence function • Functional delta method • Inverse functional • Survival analysis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.