Skip Navigation

Biometrika 2008 95(3):573-585; doi:10.1093/biomet/asn030
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ghosh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Roy, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 Biometrika Trust

Articles

Influence functions and robust Bayes and empirical Bayes small area estimation

Malay Ghosh

Department of Statistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-8545, U.S.A. ghoshm{at}stat.ufl.edu

Tapabrata Maiti

Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-1210, U.S.A. taps{at}iastate.edu

Ananya Roy

Department of Statistics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583-0963, U.S.A. aroy2{at}unlnotes.unl.edu

Received for publication 1 November 2005. Revision received 1 April 2008.
   Abstract

We introduce new robust small area estimation procedures based on area-level models. We first find influence functions corresponding to each individual area-level observation by measuring the divergence between the posterior density functions of regression coefficients with and without that observation. Next, based on these influence functions, properly standardized, we propose some new robust Bayes and empirical Bayes small area estimators. The mean squared errors and estimated mean squared errors of these estimators are also found. A small simulation study compares the performance of the robust and the regular empirical Bayes estimators. When the model variance is larger than the sample variance, the proposed robust empirical Bayes estimators are superior.

Key Words: Hellinger distance • Kullback–Leibler divergence • Limited translation rule • Maximum likelihood estimation • Predictive influence function


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.