Skip Navigation


Biometrika Advance Access originally published online on November 22, 2007
Biometrika 2007 94(4):905-919; doi:10.1093/biomet/asm063
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/4/905    most recent
asm063v1
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yun, S.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Kenward, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2007 Biometrika Trust

Articles

Using Hierarchical Likelihood for Missing Data Problems

Sung-Cheol Yun

Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 138-736, Korea ysch97{at}amc.seoul.kr

Youngjo Lee

Department of Statistics, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Korea youngjo{at}plaza.snu.ac.kr

Michael G. Kenward

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, U.K. mike.kenward{at}lshtm.ac.uk

Received for publication 1 June 2005. Revision received 1 March 2007.
  Abstract

Most statistical solutions to the problem of statistical inference with missing data involve integration or expectation. This can be done in many ways: directly or indirectly, analytically or numerically, deterministically or stochastically. Missing-data problems can be formulated in terms of latent random variables, so that hierarchical likelihood methods of Lee & Nelder (1996) can be applied to missing-value problems to provide one solution to the problem of integration of the likelihood. The resulting methods effectively use a Laplace approximation to the marginal likelihood with an additional adjustment to the measures of precision to accommodate the estimation of the fixed effects parameters. We first consider missing at random cases where problems are simpler to handle because the integration does not need to involve the missing-value mechanism and then consider missing not at random cases. We also study tobit regression and refit the missing not at random selection model to the antidepressant trial data analyzed in Diggle & Kenward (1994).

Key Words: Adjusted profile likelihood • Hierarchical likelihood • Marginal likelihood • Missing data • Restricted likelihood


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.