Skip Navigation

Biometrika 2007 94(4):1006-1013; doi:10.1093/biomet/asm073
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pourahmadi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2007 Biometrika Trust

Miscellanea

Cholesky Decompositions and Estimation of A Covariance Matrix: Orthogonality of Variance–Correlation Parameters

Mohsen Pourahmadi

Division of Statistics, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois 60115-2854, U.S.A. pourahm{at}math.niu.edu

Received for publication 1 July 2005. Revision received 1 April 2007.
   Abstract

Chen & Dunson ([3]) have proposed a modified Cholesky decomposition of the form {sigma} = D L L'D for a covariance matrix where D is a diagonal matrix with entries proportional to the square roots of the diagonal entries of {Sigma} and L is a unit lower-triangular matrix solely determining its correlation matrix. This total separation of variance and correlation is definitely a major advantage over the more traditional modified Cholesky decomposition of the form LD2L', (Pourahmadi, [13]). We show that, though the variance and correlation parameters of the former decomposition are separate, they are not asymptotically orthogonal and that the estimation of the new parameters could be more demanding computationally. We also provide statistical interpretation for the entries of L and D as certain moving average parameters and innovation variances and indicate how the existing likelihood procedures can be employed to estimate the new parameters.

Key Words: Maximum likelihood estimation • Moving average coefficient • Positive-definiteness constraint • Unconstrained parameterization • Variance–correlation separation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.