Skip Navigation


Biometrika Advance Access originally published online on May 14, 2007
Biometrika 2007 94(2):502-508; doi:10.1093/biomet/asm028
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/2/502    most recent
asm028v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reiter, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2007 Biometrika Trust

Miscellanea

Small-sample degrees of freedom for multi-component significance tests with multiple imputation for missing data

Jerome P. Reiter

Institute of Statistics and Decision Sciences, Duke University, Box 90251, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0251, U.S.A.

jerry{at}stat.duke.edu

Received for publication 1 February 2006. Revision received 1 August 2006.
  Abstract

When performing multi-component significance tests with multiply-imputed datasets, analysts can use a Wald-like test statistic and a reference F-distribution. The currently employed degrees of freedom in the denominator of this F-distribution are derived assuming an infinite sample size. For modest complete-data sample sizes, this degrees of freedom can be unrealistic; for example, it may exceed the complete-data degrees of freedom. This paper presents an alternative denominator degrees of freedom that is always less than or equal to the complete-data denominator degrees of freedom, and equals the currently employed denominator degrees of freedom for infinite sample sizes. Its advantages over the currently employed degrees of freedom are illustrated with a simulation.

Key Words: Missing data • Multiple imputation • Significance test


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BiometrikaHome page
J. P. Reiter
Multiple imputation when records used for imputation are not used or disseminated for analysis
Biometrika, December 1, 2008; 95(4): 933 - 946.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.