Skip Navigation


Biometrika Advance Access originally published online on February 28, 2007
Biometrika 2007 94(1):135-152; doi:10.1093/biomet/asm014
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/1/135    most recent
asm014v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bayarri, M.J.
Right arrow Articles by García-Donato, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2007 Biometrika Trust

Articles

Extending conventional priors for testing general hypotheses in linear models

M.J. Bayarri

Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Valencia, 46100 Valencia, Spain

Gonzalo García-Donato

Department of Economics and Finance, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 02071 Albacete, Spain

susie.bayarri{at}uv.es

gonzalo.garciadonato{at}uclm.es

Received for publication 1 March 2005. Revision received 1 July 2006.
   Abstract

We consider that observations come from a general normal linear model and that it is desirable to test a simplifying null hypothesis about the parameters. We approach this problem from an objective Bayesian, model-selection perspective. Crucial ingredients for this approach are ‘proper objective priors’ to be used for deriving the Bayes factors. Jeffreys-Zellner-Siow priors have good properties for testing null hypotheses defined by specific values of the parameters in full-rank linear models. We extend these priors to deal with general hypotheses in general linear models, not necessarily of full rank. The resulting priors, which we call ‘conventional priors’, are expressed as a generalization of recently introduced ‘partially informative distributions’. The corresponding Bayes factors are fully automatic, easily computed and very reasonable. The methodology is illustrated for the change-point problem and the equality of treatments effects problem. We compare the conventional priors derived for these problems with other objective Bayesian proposals like the intrinsic priors. It is concluded that both priors behave similarly although interesting subtle differences arise. We adapt the conventional priors to deal with nonnested model selection as well as multiple-model comparison. Finally, we briefly address a generalization of conventional priors to nonnormal scenarios.

Key Words: analysis-of-variance model • changepoint problem • model selection • objective Bayesian methods • partially informative distribution • regression model


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.