Skip Navigation

Biometrika 2006 93(4):943-959; doi:10.1093/biomet/93.4.943
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pfeffermann, D.
Right arrow Articles by Do Nascimento Silva, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 Biometrika Trust

Multi-level modelling under informative sampling

Danny Pfeffermann1, Fernando Antonio Da Silva Moura2 and Pedro Luis Do Nascimento Silva3

1 Department of Statistics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91905, Israel msdanny{at}huji.ac.il, 2 Department of Statistical Methods, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21945-970, Brazil fmoura{at}im.ufrj.br, 3 Escola Nacional de Ciencias Estatisticas—IBGE, Rio de Janeiro, 20231-050, Brazil pedrosilva{at}ibge.gov.br


   Abstract

We consider a model-dependent approach for multi-level modelling that accounts for informative probability sampling of first- and lower-level population units. The proposed approach consists of first extracting the hierarchical model holding for the sample data given the selected sample, as a function of the corresponding population model and the first- and lower-level sample selection probabilities, and then fitting the resulting sample model using Bayesian methods. An important implication of the use of the model holding for the sample is that the sample selection probabilities feature in the analysis as additional data that possibly strengthen the estimators. A simulation experiment is carried out in order to study the performance of this approach and compare it to the use of ‘design-based’ methods. The simulation study indicates that both approaches perform in general equally well in terms of point estimation, but the model-dependent approach yields confidence/credibility intervals with better coverage properties. Another simulation study assesses the impact of misspecification of the models assumed for the sample selection probabilities. The use of maximum likelihood estimation is also considered.

Key Words: Confidence interval; Credibility interval; Full likelihood; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Maximum likelihood estimation; Probability weighting; Small area estimation.


Received May 2004. Revised March 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.