Skip Navigation

Biometrika 2006 93(4):861-876; doi:10.1093/biomet/93.4.861
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, X.
Right arrow Articles by Stokes, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 Biometrika Trust

Forming post-strata via Bayesian treed capture-recapture models

Xinlei Wang1, Johan Lim2 and S. Lynne Stokes3

1 Department of Statistical Science, Southern Methodist University, 3225 Daniel Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75275-0332, U.S.A. swang{at}mail.smu.edu, 2 Department of Applied Statistics, Yonsei University, ShinChon Dong 134, SeoDaeMun Gu, Seoul, 120-749, Korea johanlim{at}yonsei.ac.kr, 3 Department of Statistical Science, Southern Methodist University, 3225 Daniel Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75275-0332, U.S.A. slstokes{at}mail.smu.edu


   Abstract

For the problem of dual system estimation, we propose a Bayesian treed capture-recapture model to account for heterogeneity of capture probabilities where individual auxiliary information is available. The model uses a binary tree to partition the covariate space into ‘homogeneous’ regions, within each of which the capture response can be described adequately by a simple model that assumes equal catchability. The attractive features of the proposed model include reduction of correlation bias, robustness and practical flexibility as well as simplicity and interpretability. In addition, it provides a systematic and effective way of forming post-strata for the Sekar–Deming estimator of population size. We compare the performance of estimators based on this model to those of alternative estimators in three scenarios.

Key Words: Bayesian model selection; Binary tree; Census undercount estimation; Dual system estimation; Heterogeneity; Parallel tempering.


Received September 2004. Revised March 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.