Skip Navigation

Correction for Steinberg and Lin, Biometrika 93 (2) 279-288.
Biometrika 2006 93(4):1025; doi:10.1093/biomet/93.4.1025-a
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steinberg, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lin, D. K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 Biometrika Trust

Amendments and Corrections

Amendments and Corrections

David M. Steinberg and Dennis K. J. Lin

dms{at}post.tau.ac.il, dkl5{at}psu.edu


  Abstract

doi:10.1093/biomet/93.2.279

The paper included comparison of a 12-factor, 16-run design to randomly generated Latin hypercube designs and U-designs, with respect to the properties of their alias matrices. An error in a computer program led to incorrect computation of the properties of the alias matrix of the orthogonal design. A corrected version of Table 2 is provided here. The orthogonal Latin hypercube design still has better properties than the best of 100 random designs, but the differences are less striking than those in our original table.

Received September 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.