Skip Navigation

Biometrika 2006 93(2):439-450; doi:10.1093/biomet/93.2.439
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hall, P.
Right arrow Articles by Neumeyer, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 Biometrika Trust

Estimating a bivariate density when there are extra data on one or both components

Peter Hall1 and Natalie Neumeyer2

1 Centre for Mathematics and its Applications, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia. halpstat{at}maths.anu.edu.au, 2 Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Fakultät für Mathematik, 44780 Bochum, Germany. natalie.neumeyer{at}rub.de

The objective of this paper is to estimate a bivariate density nonparametrically from a dataset from the joint distribution and datasets from one or both marginal distributions. We develop a copula-based solution, which has potential benefits even when the marginal datasets are empty. For example, if the copula density is sufficiently smooth in the region where we wish to estimate it, the joint density can be estimated with a high degree of accuracy. Similar improvements in performance are available if the marginals are close to being independent. We use wavelet estimators to approximate the copula density, which in cases of statistical interest can be unbounded along boundaries. Our techniques are also useful for solving recently-considered related problems, for example where the marginal distributions are determined by parametric models. The methodology is also readily extended to more general multivariate settings.

Key Words: Copula; Dimension reduction; Independence; Kernel method; Prediction; Threshold; Wavelet.


Received August 2005. Revised November 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.