Skip Navigation

Biometrika 2006 93(2):255-268; doi:10.1093/biomet/93.2.255
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, R.
Right arrow Articles by Tzavidis, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 Biometrika Trust

M-quantile models for small area estimation

Ray Chambers1 and Nikos Tzavidis2

1 Centre for Statistical and Survey Methodology, University of Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia. ray{at}uow.edu.au, 2 Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education, University of London, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, U.K. n.tzavidis{at}ioe.ac.uk

Small area estimation techniques typically rely on regression models that use both covariates and random effects to explain variation between the areas. However, such models also depend on strong distributional assumptions, require a formal specification of the random part of the model and do not easily allow for outlier-robust inference. We describe a new approach to small area estimation that is based on modelling quantilelike parameters of the conditional distribution of the target variable given the covariates. This avoids the problems associated with specification of random effects, allowing inter-area differences to be characterised by area-specific M-quantile coefficients. The proposed approach is easily made robust against outlying data values and can be adapted for estimation of a wide range of area-specific parameters, including quantiles of the distribution of the target variable in the different small areas. The differences between M-quantile and random effects models are discussed and the alternative approaches to small area estimation are compared using both simulated and real data.

Key Words: Influence function; Median estimation; Multilevel model; Robust inference; Quantile regression; Weighted least squares.


Received January 2005. Revised November 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.