Skip Navigation

Biometrika 2006 93(1):215-220; doi:10.1093/biomet/93.1.215
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, S. X.
Right arrow Articles by Cui, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 Biometrika Trust

Miscellanea

On Bartlett correction of empirical likelihood in the presence of nuisance parameters

Song Xi Chen1 and Hengjian Cui2

1 Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-1210, U.S.A. songchen{at}iastate.edu, 2 Department of Statistics and Financial Mathematics, Beijing Normal University, 100875, China hjcui{at}bnu.eud.cn

Lazar & Mykland (1999) showed that an empirical likelihood defined by two estimating equations with a nuisance parameter need not be Bartlett-correctable. This paper shows that Bartlett correction of empirical likelihood in the presence of a nuisance parameter depends critically on the way the nuisance parameter is removed when formulating the likelihood for the parameter of interest. We establish in the broad framework of estimating functions that the empirical likelihood is still Bartlett-correctable if the nuisance parameter is profiled out given the value of the parameter of interest.

Key Words: Bartlett correction; Empirical likelihood; Estimation equation; Nuisance parameter

Received August 2004. Revised March 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BiometrikaHome page
S. X. Chen, L. Peng, and Y.-L. Qin
Effects of data dimension on empirical likelihood
Biometrika, September 1, 2009; 96(3): 711 - 722.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.