Skip Navigation

Biometrika 2005 92(4):937-950; doi:10.1093/biomet/92.4.937
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Biometrika Trust

Can the strengths of AIC and BIC be shared? A conflict between model indentification and regression estimation

Yuhong Yang

School of Statistics, University of Minnesota, 224 Church Street S.E., Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, U.S.A. yyang{at}stat.umn.edu

A traditional approach to statistical inference is to identify the true or best model first with little or no consideration of the specific goal of inference in the model identification stage. Can the pursuit of the true model also lead to optimal regression estimation? In model selection, it is well known that BIC is consistent in selecting the true model, and AIC is minimax-rate optimal for estimating the regression function. A recent promising direction is adaptive model selection, in which, in contrast to AIC and BIC, the penalty term is data-dependent. Some theoretical and empirical results have been obtained in support of adaptive model selection, but it is still not clear if it can really share the strengths of AIC and BIC. Model combining or averaging has attracted increasing attention as a means to overcome the model selection uncertainty. Can Bayesian model averaging be optimal for estimating the regression function in a minimax sense? We show that the answers to these questions are basically in the negative: for any model selection criterion to be consistent, it must behave suboptimally for estimating the regression function in terms of minimax rate of covergence; and Bayesian model averaging cannot be minimax-rate optimal for regression estimation.

Key Words: AIC; BIC; Consistency; Minimax-rate optimality; Model averaging; Model selection


Received August 2004. Revised April 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
N. L. Pace and W. M. Briggs
Stepwise Logistic Regression
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2009; 109(1): 285 - 286.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BiometrikaHome page
J. Huang, S. Ma, H. Xie, and C.-H. Zhang
A group bridge approach for variable selection
Biometrika, June 1, 2009; 96(2): 339 - 355.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Service ResearchHome page
B. Cooil, L. Aksoy, T. L. Keiningham, and K. M. Maryott
The Relationship of Employee Perceptions of Organizational Climate to Business-Unit Outcomes: An MPLS Approach
Journal of Service Research, February 1, 2009; 11(3): 277 - 294.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.