Skip Navigation

Biometrika 2005 92(2):419-434; doi:10.1093/biomet/92.2.419
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Behseta, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wallstrom, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Biometrika Trust

Hierarchical models for assessing variability among functions

Sam Behseta1, Robert E. Kass2 and Garrick L. Wallstrom3

1 Department of Mathematics, California State University, Bakersfield, California 93311, U.S.A. sbehseta{at}csub.edu, 2 Department of Statistics and Center for Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, U.S.A. kass{at}stat.cmu.edu, 3 Center for Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, U.S.A. garrick{at}cbmi.pitt.edu

In many applications of functional data analysis, summarising functional variation based on fits, without taking account of the estimation process, runs the risk of attributing the estimation variation to the functional variation, thereby overstating the latter. For example, the first eigenvalue of a sample covariance matrix computed from estimated functions may be biased upwards. We display a set of estimated neuronal Poisson-process intensity functions where this bias is substantial, and we discuss two methods for accounting for estimation variation. One method uses a random-coefficient model, which requires all functions to be fitted with the same basis functions. An alternative method removes the same-basis restriction by means of a hierarchical Gaussian process model. In a small simulation study the hierarchical Gaussian process model outperformed the randomcoefficient model and greatly reduced the bias in the estimated first eigenvalue that would result from ignoring estimation variability. For the neuronal data the hierarchical Gaussian process estimate of the first eigenvalue was much smaller than the naive estimate that ignored variability due to function estimation. The neuronal setting also illustrates the benefit of incorporating alignment parameters into the hierarchical scheme.

Key Words: Bayesian adaptive regression spline; Bayesian functional data analysis; Curve fitting; Freeknot spline; Functional data analysis; Hierarchical Gaussian process; Neuron spike train; Nonparametric regression; Reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo; Smoothing


Received September 2003. Revised October 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BiostatisticsHome page
A. Rodriguez, D. B. Dunson, and J. Taylor
Bayesian hierarchically weighted finite mixture models for samples of distributions
Biostat., August 16, 2008; (2008) kxn024v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.