Skip Navigation

Biometrika 2005 92(1):229-233; doi:10.1093/biomet/92.1.229
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hwang, W.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Huggins, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Biometrika Trust

Miscellanea

An examination of the effect of heterogeneity on the estimation of population size using capture-recapture data

Wen-Han Hwang1 and Richard Huggins2

1 Department of Statistics, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan whhwang{at}fcu.edu.tw, 2 Department of Statistical Science, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia r.huggins{at}latrobe.edu.au

Part of the folklore of capture-recapture experiments is that ignoring heterogeneity of capture probabilities results in a downward bias. This has been based on experience and simulation studies but is often interpreted as being due to individuals with lower capture probabilities. Here estimating equation arguments are used to show that the effect on Horvitz–Thompson-type estimators of ignoring heterogeneity in capture-recapture experiments is to introduce a downward bias. The arguments are extended to continuous-time experiments and to an influence function constructed to determine the effect of a small number of individuals with heterogeneous capture probabilities in an otherwise homogeneous population and the influence function is shown to be negative. The downward bias holds even if the small number of heterogeneous individuals have capture probabilities larger than the homogeneous majority, and this is confirmed by simulations.

Key Words: Bias; Capture-recapture; Estimating equation; Heterogeneous capture probabilities


Received February 2004. Revised June 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.