Skip Navigation

Biometrika 2004 91(4):863-876; doi:10.1093/biomet/91.4.863
© 2004 by Biometrika Trust
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pierce, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kellerer, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Adjusting for covariate errors with nonparametric assessment of the true covariate distribution

Donald A. Pierce1 and Albrecht M. Kellerer2

1 Radiation Effects Research Foundation, 5-2 Hijiyama Park, Hiroshima 732-0815, Japan pierce{at}rerf.or.jp, 2 Radiobiological Institute, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Schillerstrasse 42, Munich 80336, Germany amk.sbi{at}lrz.uni-muenchen.de

A well-known and useful method for generalised regression analysis when a linear covariate x is available only through some approximation z is to carry out more or less the usual analysis with E(x|z) substituted for x. Sometimes, but not always, the quantity var (x|z) should be used to allow for overdispersion introduced by this substitution. These quantities involve the distribution of true covariates x, and with some exceptions this requires assessment of that distribution through the distribution of observed values z. It is often desirable to take a nonparametric approach to this, which inherently involves a deconvolution that is difficult to carry our directly. However, if covariate errors are assumed to be multiplicative and log-normal, simple but accurate approximations are available for the quantities E(xk|z) (k = 1, 2, ...). In particular, the approximations depend only on the first two derivatives of the logarithm of the density of z at the point under consideration and the coefficient of variation of z|x. The methods will thus be most useful in large-scale observational studies where the distribution of z can be assessed well enough in an essentially nonparametric manner to approximate adequately those derivatives. We consider both the classical and Berkson error models. This approach is applied to radiation dose estimates for atomic-bomb survivors.

Key Words: Berkson errors; Classical error model; Deconvolution of covariate errors; Errors in covariables; Generalised regression model; Regression calibration


Received March 2003. Revised March 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.