Skip Navigation

Biometrika 2004 91(3):579-589; doi:10.1093/biomet/91.3.579
© 2004 by Biometrika Trust
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, H.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


A diagnostic procedure based on local influence

Hongtu Zhu1 and Heping Zhang2

1 Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University and New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 74, New York, New York 10032, U.S.A. hz2114{at}columbia.edu, 2 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8034, U.S.A. heping.zhang{at}yale.edu

Cook's (1986) normal curvature measure is useful for sensitivity analysis of model assumptions in statistical models. However, there is no rigorous approach based on the normal curvature for addressing two fundamental issues: to assess the extent of discrepancy between an assumed model and the underlying model from which the data are generated, and to identify suspicious data points for which the discrepancy is most evident. Our purpose is to establish a theoretically sound procedure for resolving these issues for case-weight perturbation under the framework of independent distributions. We show that the local influence measure, Cook's distance and likelihood distance are asymptotically equivalent. A diagnostic procedure, based on local influence, is proposed for evaluating model misspecification and for detecting influential points simultaneously. We analyse two real datasets.

Key Words: Case weight; Cook's distance; Likelihood displacement; Local influence measure; Model misspecification; Normal curvature


Received April 2003. Revised November 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BiometrikaHome page
H. Zhu, J. G. Ibrahim, N. Tang, and H. Zhang
Diagnostic measures for empirical likelihood of general estimating equations
Biometrika, June 1, 2008; 95(2): 489 - 507.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.