Skip Navigation

Biometrika 2003 90(3):741-746; doi:10.1093/biomet/90.3.741
© 2003 by Biometrika Trust
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xiang, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Langholz, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Miscellanea

Robust variance estimation for rate ratio parameter estimates from individually matched case-control data

Anny Hui Xiang1 and Bryan Langholz1

1 Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, 1540 Alcazar St., CHP-218, Los Angeles, California 90033-9987, U.S.Axiang{at}usc.edu langholz{at}usc.edu

The asymptotic variance and robust variance estimators of rate ratios estimated using conditional logistic regression from individually-matched case-control data are derived when the presumed proportional hazards model is misspecified.The robust variance estimators are easily computed using Schoenfeld residuals generated from standard partial likelihood estimation software for failure time data. Simulation studies indicate that the robust variance estimators perform well for typical sizes and that the ‘rare disease’ version should be adequate for all practical purposes. It was also found that model misspecification must be quite extreme before the model-based, i.e. inverse information, variance is significantly biased and that the robust variance estimators are somewhat more variable than the model-based. We conclude that the model-based variance estimator can be used when model misspecification is not severe. The robust estimator should be used when the presumed model clearly fits the data poorly.

Key Words: Cox model; Epidemiology; Jackknife; Nested case-control study; Proportional hazards model; Robust variance


Received June 2002. Revised December 2002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.