Skip Navigation

Biometrika 2003 90(1):29-41; doi:10.1093/biomet/90.1.29
© 2003 by Biometrika Trust
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Y.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Carey, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Working correlation structure misspecification, estimation and covariate design: Implications for generalised estimating equations performance

You-Gan Wang1 and Vincent Carey2

1 Department of Statistics and Applied Probability, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543 stawyg{at}nus.edu.sg 2 Channing Laboratory, Harvard Medical School, 181 Longwood Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, U.S.A.channing.harvard.edu

The method of generalised estimating equations for regression modelling of clustered outcomes allows for specification of a working matrix that is intended to approximate the true correlation matrix of the observations.We investigate the asymptotic relative efficiency of the generalised estimating equation for the mean parameters when the correlation parameters are estimated by various methods. The asymptotic relative efficiency depends on three features of the analysis, namely (i) the discrepancy between the working correlation structure and the unobservable true correlation structure, (ii) the method by which the correlation parameters are estimated and (iii) the ‘design’, by which we refer to both the structures of the predictor matrices within clusters and distribution of cluster sizes. Analytical and numerical studies of realistic data-analysis scenarios show that choice of working covariance model has a substantial impact on regression estimator efficiency. Protection against avoidable loss of efficiency associated with covariance misspecification is obtained when a ‘Gaussian estimation’ pseudolikelihood procedure is used with an AR(1) structure.

Key Words: Design matrix; Efficiency; Estimating function; Longitudinal data; Pseudolikelihood; Repeated measures


Received November 2000. Revised April 2002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BiostatisticsHome page
J. S. Schildcrout and P. J. Heagerty
Regression analysis of longitudinal binary data with time-dependent environmental covariates: bias and efficiency
Biostat., October 1, 2005; 6(4): 633 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICSHome page
P. Ghisletta and D. Spini
An Introduction to Generalized Estimating Equations and an Application to Assess Selectivity Effects in a Longitudinal Study on Very Old Individuals
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2004; 29(4): 421 - 437.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.