Skip Navigation

Biometrika 2002 89(2):437-450; doi:10.1093/biomet/89.2.437
© 2002 by Biometrika Trust
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DiCiccio, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Monti, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Accurate confidence limits for scalar functions of vector M-estimands

Thomas J.DiCiccio1 and Anna Clara Monti2

1 Department of Social Statistics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, U.S.A.tjd9@cornell.edu 2 Faculty of Economics, University of Sannio, Via Calandra 1, 82100 Benevento, Italy acmonti@unisannio.it

This paper concerns high-order inference for scalar parameters that are estimated by functions of multivariate M-estimators. Asymptotic formulae for the bias and skewness of the studentised statistic are derived.Although these formulae appear complicated, they can be evaluated easily by using matrix operations and numerical differentiation. Various methods for constructing second-order accurate confidence limits are discussed, including a method based on skewness-reducing transformations and a generalisation of the ABC method. The use of the skewness-reducing transformations is closely related to empirical likelihood; expressing the studentised statistic in terms of a skewness-reducing reparameterisation brings the standard asymptotic intervals closer in shape to empirical likelihood intervals. The improvement in one- and two-sided coverage accuracy achieved by taking the bias and skewness into account is illustrated in numerical examples. It is found in the examples that taking skewness into account by reparameterisation or parameterisation invariance yields better coverage accuracy than correcting for skewness by polynomial expansions.

Key Words: ABC confidence limit; Bootstrap calibration; Cornish–Fisher expansion; Coverage accuracy; Empirical likelihood; Skewness-reducing transformation; Studentised statistic

Received March 1999. Revised January 2002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.