© 2002 by Biometrika Trust
The analysis of retrospective family studies
1 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0560, U.S.Ajohn{at}biostat.ucsf.edu 2 Department of Statistics, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand scott{at}stat.auckland.ac.nz wild{at}stat.auckland.ac.nz
Case-control samples allow straightforward calculation of estimates of the association between covariates and disease status by fitting a prospective logistic regression model.In genetic studies of disease, investigators often gather additional information on response and covariate variables from family members of cases and controls. The objective is to model the responses of all the family members in terms of the covariate data. Whittemore (1995) has discussed maximum likelihood methods for fitting a special class of logistic models to family data collected according to a particular design. In the present paper, we show that we can obtain efficient semiparametric maximum likelihood estimates for an arbitrary multivariate binary regression model by fitting a modified prospective model for a wide class of retrospective designs. However, in contrast to the situation with simple case-control studies, the prospective model will differ from the original model even when the model is logistic.
Key Words: Case-control family study; Proband study; Response-selective sampling; Retrospective sampling
Received August 2000. Revised April 2001
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Wang and J. J. Hanfelt A robust method for finely stratified familial studies with proband-based sampling Biostat., April 1, 2009; 10(2): 364 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
