Skip Navigation

Biometrika 2001 88(4):933-948; doi:10.1093/biomet/88.4.933
© 2001 by Biometrika Trust
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pfeiffer, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pee, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Inference for covariates that accounts for ascertainment and random genetic effects in family studies

Ruth M.Pfeiffer1, Mitchell H.Gail1 and David Pee2

1 National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, U.S.Apfeiffer{at}mail.nih.govgailm{at}mail.nih.gov 2 Information Management Services Inc., Rockville, Maryland 20852, U.S.A.pee{at}rvims.nci.nih.gov

Family studies to identify disease-related genes often collect families with multiple cases.If environmental exposures or other measured covariates are also important, they should be incorporated into these genetic analyses to control for confounding and increase statistical power. We propose a two-level mixed effects model that allows us to estimate environmental effects while accounting for varying genetic correlations among family members and adjusting for ascertainment by conditioning on the number of cases in the family. We describe a conditional maximum likelihood analysis based on this model. When genetic effects are negligible, this conditional likelihood reduces to standard conditional logistic regression. We show that the simpler conditional logistic regression typically yields biased estimators of exposure effects, and we describe conditions under which the conditional logistic approach has little or no bias.

Key Words: Ascertainment correction; Conditional logistic regression; Correlated binary data; Family study; Misspecified model; Nested random effects model

Received May 2000. Revised January 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. Leu, K. Czene, and M. Reilly
The Impact of Truncation and Missing Family Links in Population-based Registers on Familial Risk Estimates
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2007; 166(12): 1461 - 1467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
X.(R. Yang, S. Diehl, R. Pfeiffer, C.-J. Chen, W.-L. Hsu, M. Dosemeci, Y.-J. Cheng, B. Sun, A. M. Goldstein, A. Hildesheim, et al.
Evaluation of Risk Factors for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in High-Risk Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Families in Taiwan
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2005; 14(4): 900 - 905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.