Skip Navigation

Biometrika 2001 88(3):739-751; doi:10.1093/biomet/88.3.739
© 2001 by Biometrika Trust
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hall, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Præstgaard, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Order-restricted score tests for homogeneity in generalised linear and nonlinear mixed models

Daniel B.Hall1 and Jens T.Præstgaard2

1 Department of Statistics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, U.S.Adhall{at}stat.uga.edu 2 A.C. Nielsen, 150 N. Martingale Road, Schaumburg, Illinois 60173-2076, U.S.A. jens.praestgaard{at}acnielsen.com

Lin (1997), building on work by Solomon & Cox (1992) and Lin & Breslow (1996), introduced a score test for homogeneity in the generalised linear mixed model.In this paper we propose an improvement to Lin's test that exploits the fact that covariance parameters associated with random effects in the model are constrained so as to form a positive semidefinite covariance matrix. Therefore, an omnibus score test will have power against alternatives that are known never to occur. Our improvement works by concentrating the score test into directions given by the positive semidefiniteness constraint. We apply the same sort of modification to the bias-corrected version of her score test in the generalised linear mixed model context and, in a nonlinear mixed model context, to a score test analogous to hers. We show how to obtain the limiting distribution of our proposed test statistic. We also argue, via simulations and local alternative power calculations, that the restricted test has better power than the unrestricted one.

Key Words: Lagrange multiplier test; Nonlinear regression; Random effect; Order-restricted inference; Tangent cone; Variance component


Received May 1999. Revised February 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.