© 2001 by Biometrika Trust
Bias correction for score tests arising from misspecified proportional hazards regression models
1 Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, U.S.Adirienzo{at}biostat.harvard.edu lagakos{at}biostat.harvard.edu
When censoring depends on both treatment group and covariates, tests for a randomised treatment effect arising from Cox's proportional hazards model are not in general centred at zero under the null and can be seriously distorted.We propose a corrected test that modifies the at-risk indicator in a way that corrects for this bias. The resulting test is asymptotically valid regardless of whether or not the fitted model is correctly specified. Implementation of the corrected test requires that the dependence of censoring on treatment group and covariates be modelled. Simulations indicate that the bias-corrected test performs well, even when the dependence of censoring on treatment group and covariates is not modelled exactly, and maintains high efficiency relative to the uncorrected test when the latter is valid.
Key Words: Bias correction; Cox proportional hazards model; Misspecified model; Partial likelihood; Relative efficiency; Weighted log-rank test
Received April 1999. Revised October 2000
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Park, L. Tian, and L. J. Wei One- and two-sample nonparametric inference procedures in the presence of a mixture of independent and dependent censoring Biostat., April 1, 2006; 7(2): 252 - 267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
