© 2000 by Biometrika Trust
Calibration and empirical Bayes variable selection
Department of Management Science and Information Systems, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712-1175, U.S.A. egeorge@mail.utexas.edu Department of Statistics, The Wharton School of The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6302, U.S.A. foster@diskworld.wharton.upenn.edu
For the problem of variable selection for the normal linear model, selection criteria such as AIC, Cp , BIC and RIC have fixed dimensionality penalties. Such criteria are shown to correspond to selection of maximum posterior models under implicit hyperparameter choices for a particular hierarchical Bayes formulation. Based on this calibration, we propose empirical Bayes selection criteria that use hyperparameter estimates instead of fixed choices. For obtaining these estimates, both marginal and conditional maximum likelihood methods are considered. As opposed to traditional fixed penalty criteria, these empirical Bayes criteria have dimensionality penalties that depend on the data. Their performance is seen to approximate adaptively the performance of the best fixed-penalty criterion across a variety of orthogonal and nonorthogonal set-ups, including wavelet regression. Empirical Bayes shrinkage estimators of the selected coefficients are also proposed.
Key Words: AIC; BIC; Conditional likelihood; Cp; Hierarchical model; Marginal likelihood; Model selection; RIC; Risk; Selection bias; Shrinkage estimation; Wavelets.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. M. Carvalho and J. G. Scott Objective Bayesian model selection in Gaussian graphical models Biometrika, September 1, 2009; 96(3): 497 - 512. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. S. Chung, R. T. Rust, and M. Wedel My Mobile Music: An Adaptive Personalization System for Digital Audio Players Marketing Science, January 1, 2009; 28(1): 52 - 68. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Farcomeni A review of modern multiple hypothesis testing, with particular attention to the false discovery proportion Statistical Methods in Medical Research, August 1, 2008; 17(4): 347 - 388. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Clarke A Simple Distribution-Free Test for Nonnested Model Selection Political Analysis, July 1, 2007; 15(3): 347 - 363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Yi, B. S. Yandell, G. A. Churchill, D. B. Allison, E. J. Eisen, and D. Pomp Bayesian Model Selection for Genome-Wide Epistatic Quantitative Trait Loci Analysis Genetics, July 1, 2005; 170(3): 1333 - 1344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Stine Model Selection Using Information Theory and the MDL Principle Sociological Methods Research, November 1, 2004; 33(2): 230 - 260. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Yi A Unified Markov Chain Monte Carlo Framework for Mapping Multiple Quantitative Trait Loci Genetics, June 1, 2004; 167(2): 967 - 975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





