Skip Navigation

Biometrika 1999 86(4):948-955; doi:10.1093/biomet/86.4.948
© 1999 by Biometrika Trust
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnard, J
Right arrow Articles by Rubin, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Miscellanea. Small-sample degrees of freedom with multiple imputation

J BarnardA1 and DB RubinA2

Department of Statistics, Harvard University, 1 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA A1 E-mail: barnard@stat.harvard.edu A2 rubin@stat.harvard.edu

An appealing feature of multiple imputation is the simplicity of the rules for combining the multiple complete-data inferences into a final inference, the repeated-imputation inference (Rubin, 1987). This inference is based on a t distribution and is derived from a Bayesian paradigm under the assumption that the complete-data degrees of freedom, {nu}com, are infinite, but the number of imputations, m, is finite. When {nu}com is small and there is only a modest proportion of missing data, the calculated repeated-imputation degrees of freedom, {nu}m, for the t reference distribution can be much larger than {nu}com, which is clearly inappropriate. Following the Bayesian paradigm, we derive an adjusted degrees of freedom, m, with the following three properties: for fixed m and estimated fraction of missing information, m monotonically increases in {nu}com; m is always less than or equal to {nu}com; and m equals {nu}m when {nu}com is infinite. A small simulation study demonstrates the superior frequentist performance when using m rather than {nu}m.

Key Words: Bayesian inference; fraction of missing information; missing at random; missing data mechanism; repeated imputation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BiometrikaHome page
J. P. Reiter
Small-sample degrees of freedom for multi-component significance tests with multiple imputation for missing data
Biometrika, June 1, 2007; 94(2): 502 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
L. Tavazzi, A. P. Maggioni, D. Lucci, G. Cacciatore, G. Ansalone, F. Oliva, M. Porcu, and on behalf of the Italian survey on Acute Heart Fai
Nationwide survey on acute heart failure in cardiology ward services in Italy
Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2006; 27(10): 1207 - 1215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Psychosom. Med.Home page
C. K. Enders
A Primer on the Use of Modern Missing-Data Methods in Psychosomatic Medicine Research
Psychosom Med, May 1, 2006; 68(3): 427 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Inj. Prev.Home page
M Warner, N Schenker, M A Heinen, and L A Fingerhut
The effects of recall on reporting injury and poisoning episodes in the National Health Interview Survey
Inj. Prev., October 1, 2005; 11(5): 282 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NeurologyHome page
B. K. Puri, B. R. Leavitt, M. R. Hayden, C. A. Ross, A. Rosenblatt, J. T. Greenamyre, S. Hersch, K. S. Vaddadi, A. Sword, D. F. Horrobin, et al.
Ethyl-EPA in Huntington disease: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
Neurology, July 26, 2005; 65(2): 286 - 292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NeurologyHome page
P.M. Meyer, L.H. Powell, R.S. Wilson, S.A. Everson-Rose, H.M. Kravitz, J.L. Luborsky, T. Madden, D. Pandey, and D.A. Evans
A population-based longitudinal study of cognitive functioning in the menopausal transition
Neurology, September 23, 2003; 61(6): 801 - 806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.