Skip Navigation

Biometrika 1999 86(2):279-288; doi:10.1093/biomet/86.2.279
© 1999 by Biometrika Trust
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The likelihood-ratio test for rank in bivariate canonical correlation analysis

B Nielsen

Nuffield College, Oxford OX1 1NF, UK E-mail: bent.nielsen@nuf.ox.ac.uk

The likelihood-ratio test for the hypothesis that the smallest of two canonical correlations is zero is Bartlett adjustable. This theoretical property says that the moments of the test criterion and of a scaled version of the asymptotic distribution have the same second-order expansion. Simulations show that scaling with the exact expectation improves the asymptotic distribution, but the expectation is approximated poorly by its second-order expansion. This can be explained by the asymptotic non-similarity of the test: a standard asymptotic distribution applies whenever the largest canonical correlation is nonzero whereas a nonstandard distribution applies in the case of complete independence. The latter distribution is described. Although the expressions for the two distributions are quite different, their quantiles are nearly proportional, explaining why the Bartlett adjustment works in practice despite a lack of similarity. Further, an accurate approximation is given for the expectation using an asymptotic technique which combines the two limit distributions continuously.

Key Words: Bartlett adjustment; Canonical correlation; Nuisance parameter.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.