© 1998 by Biometrika Trust
Parameter expansion to accelerate EM: The PX-EM algorithm
Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974, U.S.A.liu{at}research.bell-labs.com
Department of Statistic, Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, U.S.A.rubin{at}hustat.harvard.edu
Department of Statistic, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, U.S.A.yingnian{at}umich.edu
The EM algorithm and its extensions are popular tools for modal estimation but are often criticised for their slow convergence. We propose a new method that can often make EM much faster. The intuitive idea is to use a covariance adjustment to correct the analysis of the M step, capitalising on extra information captured in the imputed complete data. The way we accomplish this is by parameter expansion; we expand the complete-data model while preserving the observed-data model and use the expanded complete-data model to generate EM. This parameter-expanded EM, PX-EM, algorithm shares the simplicity and stability of ordinary EM, but has a faster rate of convergence since its M step performs a more efficient analysis. The PX-EM algorithm is illustrated for the multivariate t distribution, a random effects model, factor analysis, probit regression and a Poisson imaging model.
Key Words: AECM Algorithms Covariance adjustment ECM ECME Factor analysis Multivariate t distribution Parameter expansion Poisson imaging model Probit regression Random effects model
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. C. Slaughter, A. H. Herring, and K. E. Hartmann Bayesian modeling of embryonic growth using latent variables Biostat., April 1, 2008; 9(2): 373 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Taylor and A. Verbyla Joint modelling of location and scale parameters of the t distribution Statistical Modeling, July 1, 2004; 4(2): 91 - 112. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. Rubin Teaching Statistical Inference for Causal Effects in Experiments and Observational Studies Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2004; 29(3): 343 - 367. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||


