Skip Navigation

Biometrika 1995 82(3):527-541; doi:10.1093/biomet/82.3.527
© 1995 by Biometrika Trust
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ANDERSON, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by FLEMING, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Articles

Model misspecification in proportional hazards regression

GARNET L. ANDERSON1 and THOMAS R. FLEMING2

1 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1124 Columbia Street, Seattle, Washington 98104, U.S.A.
2 Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195, U.S.A.

Received for publication 1 May 1992. Revision received 1 March 1995.
  Abstract

The proportional hazards model is frequently used to evaluate the effect of treatment on failure time events in randomised clinical trials. Concomitant variables are usually available and may be considered for use in the primary analyses under the assumption that incorporating them may reduce bias or improve efficiency. In this paper we consider two approaches to including covariate information: regression modelling and stratification. We focus on the setting where covariate effects are nonproportional and we compare the bias, efficiency and coverage properties of these approaches. These results indicate that our intuition based on linear model analysis of covariance is misleading. Covariate adjustment in proportional hazards models has little effect on the variance but may significantly improve the accuracy of the treatment effect estimator.

Key Words: Analysis of covariance • Model misspecification • Omitted covariates • Proportional hazards


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Stat Methods Med ResHome page
L. Meira-Machado, J. de Una-Alvarez, C. Cadarso-Suarez, and P. K Andersen
Multi-state models for the analysis of time-to-event data
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, April 1, 2009; 18(2): 195 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
Integrating Economic Analysis Into Cancer Clinical Trials: the National Cancer Institute-American Society of Clinical Oncology Economics Workbook
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, August 1, 1998; 1998(24): 1 - 28.
[Full Text]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.