© 1995 by Biometrika Trust
Bias correction in generalised linear mixed models with a single component of dispersion
1Department of Biostatistics, SC-32, University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195, U.S.A.
2Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, U.S.A.
General expressions are derived for the asymptotic biases in three approximate estimators of regression coefficients and variance component, for small values of the variance component, in generalised linear mixed models with canonical link function and a single source of extraneous variation. The estimators involve first and second order Laplace expansions of the integrated likelihood and a related procedure known as penalised quasi-likelihood. Numerical studies of a series of matched pairs of binary outcomes show that the first order estimators of the variance component are seriously biased. Easily computed correction factors produce satisfactory estimators of small variance components, comparable to those obtained with a second order Laplace expansion, and markedly improve the asymptotic performance for larger values. For a series of matched pairs of binomial observations, the variance correction factors rapidly approach one as the binomial denominators increase. These results greatly extend the range of parameter values for which the approximate estimation procedures have satisfactory asymptotic properties.
Key Words: Asymptotic bias Laplace expansion Matched pairs Penalised quasilikelihood
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Zwanziger and N. Khan Safety-net activities and hospital contracting with managed care organizations. Med Care Res Rev, December 1, 2006; 63(6 Suppl): 90S - 111S. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Tutz Modelling of repeated ordered measurements by isotonic sequential regression Statistical Modeling, December 1, 2005; 5(4): 269 - 287. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Min and A. Agresti Random effect models for repeated measures of zero-inflated count data Statistical Modeling, April 1, 2005; 5(1): 1 - 19. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. M. Trenkel and H. J. Skaug Disentangling the effects of capture efficiency and population abundance on catch data using random effects models ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(8): 1543 - 1555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J Cole, B. J. Morgan, and M. S Ridout Generalized linear mixed models for strawberry inflorescence data Statistical Modeling, December 1, 2003; 3(4): 273 - 290. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G Booth, J. P Hobert, and W. Jank A survey of Monte Carlo algorithms for maximizing the likelihood of a two-stage hierarchical model Statistical Modeling, December 1, 2001; 1(4): 333 - 349. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L Bellamy, R. Gibberd, L. Hancock, P. Howley, B. Kennedy, N. Klar, S. Lipsitz, and L. Ryan Analysis of dichotomous outcome data for community intervention studies Statistical Methods in Medical Research, April 1, 2000; 9(2): 135 - 159. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Breslow, B. Leroux, and R. Platt Approximate hierarchical modelling of discrete data in epidemiology Statistical Methods in Medical Research, February 1, 1998; 7(1): 49 - 62. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||



