Skip Navigation

Biometrika 1990 77(1):235-236; doi:10.1093/biomet/77.1.235-u
© 1990 by Biometrika Trust
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ROCKE, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

AMENDMENTS AND CORRECTIONS

‘Outlier resistance in small samples’

DAVID M. ROCKE


  Abstract

H. A. David and C. C. Yang, Iowa State University, have noted the following points. The author does not stay with his own definition of DT(n, q) but in fact uses


Formula

Even with this change the proof of the theorem on p. 176 is in error since the combinatorial term associated with {delta}n–r should be


Formula

However, since {delta}n–r = {delta}n–q, the theorem follows directly from Case 2 of David & Groeneveld (1982), and has essentially been proved by Sen (1985, pp. 309–11).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.