Skip Navigation

Biometrika 1988 75(4):773-778; doi:10.1093/biomet/75.4.773
© 1988 by Biometrika Trust
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HALPERIN, M.
Right arrow Articles by HAMDY, M. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Some implications of an alternative definition of the multiple comparison problem

MAX HALPERIN *, K. K. GORDON LAN and MOHAMED I. HAMDY

Biostatistics Research Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Bethesda, Maryland 20892, U.S.A.
Statistics/Computer and Information Systems Department, George Washington University Washington, D.C. 20052, U.S.A.

An approach to multiple comparisons defines the error control objective as assuring with given probability that k or fewer out of N specified linear combinations of p means are significant when an overall null hypothesis is true, or that k or fewer confidence interval statements are incorrect. The case k = 0 is basically the Scheffé (1953) method except for the consideration of a specified set of N linear combinations rather than all possible linear combinations. A theoretical result is obtained under normal theory and we assume an infinite number of linear combinations with normalized coefficients, that is the sum of squares is unity, uniformly distributed over the unit p-sphere. For a finite number N of specified linear combinations the problem is reformulated in a way which in principle would allow computation of the exact distributions required to provide critical values. In general, the computations required are so complex that they are impractical, but a Monte Carlo approach is straightforward.

Key Words: Multiple comparisons • Normal distribution • Number of erroneous statements



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICSHome page
Y. Benjamini and Y. Hochberg
On the Adaptive Control of the False Discovery Rate in Multiple Testing With Independent Statistics
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2000; 25(1): 60 - 83.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.