Skip Navigation

Biometrika 1988 75(2):287-293; doi:10.1093/biomet/75.2.287
© 1988 by Biometrika Trust
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CURNOW, R. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The use of correlated information on treatment effects when selecting the best treatment

R. N. CURNOW

Department of Applied Statistics, University of Reading Reading RG6 2AN, U.K.

The selection of the best variety of a crop to grow in a particular region can be based solely on the yields of the varieties in trials within that region or on the yields of the varieties averaged over trials within the region and trials in a number of similar regions. For a wide range of values of the parameters, the better of these two methods is shown to be almost as effective as selection based on an index combining, in an optimal way, the information from the particular region and from the other regions. A similar situation in the choice of a medical treatment for a particular type of patient is mentioned.

Key Words: Correlated information • Interaction • Selection index • Treatment selection


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Crop Sci.Home page
H. P. Piepho and J. Mohring
Best Linear Unbiased Prediction of Cultivar Effects for Subdivided Target Regions
Crop Sci., May 6, 2005; 45(3): 1151 - 1159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Crop Sci.Home page
G.N. Atlin, R.J. Baker, K.B. McRae, and X. Lu
Selection Response in Subdivided Target Regions
Crop Sci., January 1, 2000; 40(1): 7 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.