Skip Navigation

Biometrika 1988 75(2):237-249; doi:10.1093/biomet/75.2.237
© 1988 by Biometrika Trust
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by OWEN, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional

ART B. OWEN

Department of Statistics, Stanford University Stanford, California 94305, U.S.A.

The empirical distribution function based on a sample is well known to be the maximum likelihood estimate of the distribution from which the sample was taken. In this paper the likelihood function for distributions is used to define a likelihood ratio function for distributions. It is shown that this empirical likelihood ratio function can be used to construct confidence intervals for the sample mean, for a class of M-estimates that includes quantiles, and for differentiable statistical functionals. The results are nonpara-metric extensions of Wilks's (1938) theorem for parametric likelihood ratios. The intervals are illustrated on some real data and compared in a simulation to some bootstrap confidence intervals and to intervals based on Student's t statistic. A hybrid method that uses the bootstrap to determine critical values of the likelihood ratio is introduced.

Key Words: Bootstrap confidence interval • Empirical likelihood ratio • Nonparametric confidence interval • Nonparametric likelihood


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BiometrikaHome page
T. L. Lai, M.-C. Shih, and Z. Su
Tests and confidence intervals for secondary endpoints in sequential clinical trials
Biometrika, December 1, 2009; 96(4): 903 - 915.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BiometrikaHome page
S. X. Chen, L. Peng, and Y.-L. Qin
Effects of data dimension on empirical likelihood
Biometrika, September 1, 2009; 96(3): 711 - 722.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BiostatisticsHome page
D. H. Y. Leung, Y.-G. Wang, and M. Zhu
Efficient parameter estimation in longitudinal data analysis using a hybrid GEE method
Biostat., July 1, 2009; 10(3): 436 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BiometrikaHome page
J. Cheng, D. S. Small, Z. Tan, and T. R. Ten Have
Efficient nonparametric estimation of causal effects in randomized trials with noncompliance
Biometrika, March 1, 2009; 96(1): 19 - 36.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
A. Guolo
Robust techniques for measurement error correction: a review
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, December 1, 2008; 17(6): 555 - 580.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BiometrikaHome page
Q. Wang and P. Dai
Semiparametric model-based inference in the presence of missing responses
Biometrika, September 1, 2008; 95(3): 721 - 734.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BiometrikaHome page
I. H. Chang and R. Mukerjee
Bayesian and frequentist confidence intervals arising from empirical-type likelihoods
Biometrika, March 1, 2008; 95(1): 139 - 147.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BiometrikaHome page
L. Xue and L. Zhu
Empirical Likelihood Semiparametric Regression Analysis for Longitudinal Data
Biometrika, December 1, 2007; 94(4): 921 - 937.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
T. Massingham and N. Goldman
Statistics of the Log-Det Estimator
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2007; 24(10): 2277 - 2285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.