Skip Navigation

Biometrika 1981 68(3):725-727; doi:10.1093/biomet/68.3.725
© 1981 by Biometrika Trust
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GABLER, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Miscllanea

A comparison of Sampford's sampling procedure versus unequal probability sampling with replacement

S. GABLER

Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Mannheim

The classical result that simple random sampling without replacement is better than simple random sampling with replacement holds in unequal probability sampling for the sampling procedure of Sampford.

Key Words: Horvitz—Thompaon estimator • Sampling with probability proportional to size • Sampling with and without replacement


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.