Skip Navigation

Biometrika 1981 68(3):699-702; doi:10.1093/biomet/68.3.699
© 1981 by Biometrika Trust
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HILL, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Miscllanea

Asymptotic relative efficiency of survival tests with covariates

CATHERINE HILL

Département de Statistique Médicale, Institut Gustave-Roussy Villejuif, France

Comparison of survival for two groups of patients when adjusting for covariates is a standard problem in clinical trials. In this paper the general life table models developed by Cox (1972) and the stratified log rank test (Mantel & Haenszel, 1959; Peto & Peto, 1972) are compared. An analytical expression and numerical results for the asymptotic relative efficiency of the two tests are given when there is no censoring. Stratification on the covariates is asymptotically as efficient as the test arising from Cox's model provided (i) there is no treatment effect, (ii) the covariates are balanced across treatment groups and (iii) the hypotheses underlying Cox's model are satisfied. However, if the proportional hazard model does not hold for the covariates then Cox's model leads to a biased estimate of the difference between the two treatments.

Key Words: Asymptotic efficiency • Covariate model • Proportional hazards • Survival data


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.