Skip Navigation

Biometrika 1981 68(3):609-615; doi:10.1093/biomet/68.3.609
© 1981 by Biometrika Trust
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CARROLL, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by RUPPERT, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

On prediction and the power transformation family

R. J. CARROLL and DAVID RUPPERT

Department of Statistics, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill

The power transformation family is often used for transforming to a normal linear model. The variance of the regression parameter estimators can be much larger when the transformation parameter is unknown and must be estimated, compared to when the transformation parameter is known. We consider prediction of future untransformed observations when the data can be transformed to a linear model. When the transformation must be estimated, the prediction error is not much larger than when the parameter is known.

Key Words: Asymptotic distribution • Box-Cox family • Maximum likelihood estimation • Monte-Carlo simulation • Prediction of conditional median • Robustness


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BiostatisticsHome page
R. M. Pfeiffer, R. J. Carroll, W. Wheeler, D. Whitby, and S. Mbulaiteye
Combining assays for estimating prevalence of human herpesvirus 8 infection using multivariate mixture models
Biostat., January 1, 2008; 9(1): 137 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eval RevHome page
R. Weiss
Pediatric Pain, Predictive Inference, and Sensitivity Analysis
Eval Rev, December 1, 1994; 18(6): 651 - 677.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.