Skip Navigation

Biometrika 1981 68(3):577-588; doi:10.1093/biomet/68.3.577
© 1981 by Biometrika Trust
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SAMUELS, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Matching and design efficiency in epidemiological studies

MYRA L. SAMUELS

Department of Statistics, Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana

For an observational study to compare two groups with respect to a dichotomous outcome variable, the design strategy of matching observational units with respect to a potential confounding variable X is compared with the strategy of selecting independent samples with possible poststratification on X for bias control. The comparison is based on asymptotic relative efficiencies of appropriate Mantel—Haenszel chi-squared tests. It is found that proper understanding requires that the prospective and the retrospective study designs be separately considered, and that in certain circumstances the effect of matching on design efficiency is entirely different for the two designs. Conditions are established under which matching is more efficient than poststratification for the control of confounding.

Key Words: Bias control • Confounding • Contingency table • Epidemiology • Mantel-Haenszel test • Matching • Observational study • Retrospective study • Simpson's paradox


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.