Skip Navigation

Biometrika 1980 67(3):591-596; doi:10.1093/biomet/67.3.591
© 1980 by Biometrika Trust
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BRIER, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Analysis of contingency tables under cluster sampling

STEPHEN S. BRIER

Department of Statistics, University of Iowa Iowa City

The Dirichlet-multinomial distribution is formulated as a model for contingency tables generated by cluster sampling schemes. This model provides an alternative justification for some results of Altham (1976) and enables an extension of her results to the case of unequal cluster sizes. The model also provides a convenient framework for the fitting and testing of general log linear models in contingency tables. The asymptotic distributions of the Pearson and likelihood ratio chi-squared statistics are shown to be multiples of chi-squared random variables and this result permits a simple modification of the usual procedures when faced with a cluster sample.

Key Words: Cluster sample • Contingency table • Dirichlet-multinomial distribution • Goodness-of-fit test • Log linear model


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
J. F. Reed III
Adjusted Chi-Square Statistics: Application to Clustered Binary Data in Primary Care
Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2004; 2(3): 201 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
H. Darwish, I. E. Trejo, I. Shapira, S. Oweineh, M. Sughayer, L. Baron, E. Aljadeff, M. Silbermann, W. Sweidan, D. Zilberg, et al.
Fighting colorectal cancer: molecular epidemiology differences among Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews and Palestinians
Ann. Onc., September 1, 2002; 13(9): 1497 - 1501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
N. Arber, H. Hibshoosh, W. Yasui, A. I. Neugut, A. Hibshoosh, Y. Yao, A. Sgambato, H. Yamamoto, I. Shapira, D. Rosenman, et al.
Abnormalities in the Expression of Cell Cycle-related Proteins in Tumors of the Small Bowel
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 1999; 8(12): 1101 - 1105.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICSHome page
R. D. Vaughan and M. D. Begg
Methods for the Analysis of Pair-Matched Binary Data from School-based Intervention Studies
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 1999; 24(4): 367 - 383.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
P. Dey, S. Collins, S. Will, and C. B J Woodman
Randomised controlled trial assessing effectiveness of health education leaflets in reducing incidence of sunburn
BMJ, October 21, 1995; 311(7012): 1062 - 1063.
[Full Text]


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
M. E. WALKER, S. WASSERMAN, and B. WELLMAN
Statistical Models for Social Support Networks
Sociological Methods Research, August 1, 1993; 22(1): 71 - 98.
[Abstract]


Home page
Cross-Cultural ResearchHome page
M. M. Dow
Saving the Theory: On Chi-Square Tests With Cross-Cultural Survey Data
Cross-Cultural Research, August 1, 1993; 27(3-4): 247 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
A. Donner and D. Banting
Analysis of Site-specific Data in Dental Studies
Journal of Dental Research, November 1, 1988; 67(11): 1392 - 1395.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
P. D. ALLISON
Introducing a Disturbance into Logit and Probit Regression Models
Sociological Methods Research, May 1, 1987; 15(4): 355 - 374.
[Abstract]


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
E. S. LEE, R. N. FORTHOFER, and R. J. LORIMOR
Analysis of Complex Sample Survey Data: Problems and Strategies
Sociological Methods Research, November 1, 1986; 15(1-2): 69 - 100.
[Abstract]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.