© 1980 by Biometrika Trust
Analysis of contingency tables under cluster sampling
Department of Statistics, University of Iowa Iowa City
The Dirichlet-multinomial distribution is formulated as a model for contingency tables generated by cluster sampling schemes. This model provides an alternative justification for some results of Altham (1976) and enables an extension of her results to the case of unequal cluster sizes. The model also provides a convenient framework for the fitting and testing of general log linear models in contingency tables. The asymptotic distributions of the Pearson and likelihood ratio chi-squared statistics are shown to be multiples of chi-squared random variables and this result permits a simple modification of the usual procedures when faced with a cluster sample.
Key Words: Cluster sample Contingency table Dirichlet-multinomial distribution Goodness-of-fit test Log linear model
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. F. Reed III Adjusted Chi-Square Statistics: Application to Clustered Binary Data in Primary Care Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2004; 2(3): 201 - 203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Darwish, I. E. Trejo, I. Shapira, S. Oweineh, M. Sughayer, L. Baron, E. Aljadeff, M. Silbermann, W. Sweidan, D. Zilberg, et al. Fighting colorectal cancer: molecular epidemiology differences among Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews and Palestinians Ann. Onc., September 1, 2002; 13(9): 1497 - 1501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Arber, H. Hibshoosh, W. Yasui, A. I. Neugut, A. Hibshoosh, Y. Yao, A. Sgambato, H. Yamamoto, I. Shapira, D. Rosenman, et al. Abnormalities in the Expression of Cell Cycle-related Proteins in Tumors of the Small Bowel Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 1999; 8(12): 1101 - 1105. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Vaughan and M. D. Begg Methods for the Analysis of Pair-Matched Binary Data from School-based Intervention Studies Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 1999; 24(4): 367 - 383. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Dey, S. Collins, S. Will, and C. B J Woodman Randomised controlled trial assessing effectiveness of health education leaflets in reducing incidence of sunburn BMJ, October 21, 1995; 311(7012): 1062 - 1063. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. WALKER, S. WASSERMAN, and B. WELLMAN Statistical Models for Social Support Networks Sociological Methods Research, August 1, 1993; 22(1): 71 - 98. [Abstract] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Dow Saving the Theory: On Chi-Square Tests With Cross-Cultural Survey Data Cross-Cultural Research, August 1, 1993; 27(3-4): 247 - 276. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Donner and D. Banting Analysis of Site-specific Data in Dental Studies Journal of Dental Research, November 1, 1988; 67(11): 1392 - 1395. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. ALLISON Introducing a Disturbance into Logit and Probit Regression Models Sociological Methods Research, May 1, 1987; 15(4): 355 - 374. [Abstract] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. LEE, R. N. FORTHOFER, and R. J. LORIMOR Analysis of Complex Sample Survey Data: Problems and Strategies Sociological Methods Research, November 1, 1986; 15(1-2): 69 - 100. [Abstract] |
||||







