Skip Navigation

Biometrika 1974 61(1):165-170; doi:10.1093/biomet/61.1.165
© 1974 by Biometrika Trust
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by YUEN, K. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The two-sample trimmed t for unequal population variances

KAREN K. YUEN

Department of Biomathematics, University of California Los Angeles

The effect of nonnormality on the Weleh approximate degrees of freedom t test is demonstrated. A two-sample trimmed t statistic for unequal population variances is proposed and its performance is also evaluated in comparison to the Welch t test under normality and under long-tailed distributions. If the underlying distributions is long-tailed or contaminated with outliers, the trimmed t is strongly recommended.

Key Words: Behrens-Fisher problem • Robust test • t distribution • Trimming • Winsorization


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Applied LinguisticsHome page
J. Larson-Hall and R. Herrington
Improving Data Analysis in Second Language Acquisition by Utilizing Modern Developments in Applied Statistics
Applied Linguistics, October 16, 2009; (2009) amp038v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
L. M. Lix, K. N. Deering, R. T. Fouladi, and P. Manivong
Comparing Treatment and Control Groups on Multiple Outcomes: Robust Procedures for Testing a Directional Alternative Hypothesis
Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 2009; 69(2): 198 - 215.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
P. Petrossians, L. Borges-Martins, C. Espinoza, A. Daly, D. Betea, H. Valdes-Socin, A. Stevenaert, P. Chanson, and A. Beckers
Gross total resection or debulking of pituitary adenomas improves hormonal control of acromegaly by somatostatin analogs
Eur. J. Endocrinol., January 1, 2005; 152(1): 61 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
L. M. Lix and H. J. Keselman
Multivariate Tests of Means in Independent Groups Designs: Effects of Covariance Heterogeneity and Nonnormality
Eval Health Prof, March 1, 2004; 27(1): 45 - 69.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
R. A. Cribbie and H. J. Keselman
The Effects of Nonnormality on Parametric, Nonparametric, and Model Comparison Approaches to Pairwise Comparisons
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2003; 63(4): 615 - 635.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
L. M. Lix and H. J. Keselman
To Trim or Not to Trim: Tests of Location Equality Under Heteroscedasticityand Nonnormality
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1998; 58(3): 409 - 429.
[Abstract]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
W. T. Coombs, J. Algina, and D. O. Oltman
Univariate and Multivariate Omnibus Hypothesis Tests Selected to Control Type I Error Rates When Population Variances Are Not Necessarily Equal
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1996; 66(2): 137 - 179.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
R. R. Wilcox
ANOVA: A Paradigm for Low Power and Misleading Measures of Effect Size?
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1995; 65(1): 51 - 77.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICSHome page
J. Algina, T. C. Oshima, and W.-Y. Lin
Type I Error Rates for Welch's Test and James's Second-Order Test Under Nonnormality and Inequality of Variance When There Are Two Groups
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 1994; 19(3): 275 - 291.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.