© 1973 by Biometrika Trust
A Monte-Carlo study of asymptotically robust tests for correlation coefficients
University of California Davis
Monte-Carlo simulation is used to compare the small-sample performance of the usual normal theory procedures for inference about correlation coefficients with that of two asymptotically robust procedures, one of which is based on a grouping of the observations and the other on the jackknife technique. The sampled distributions comprise the normal and five nonnormal distributions. The small-sample results support the conclusion based on asymptotic theory that the normal test is not robust. The jackknife procedure works well for most of the sampled distributions.
Key Words: Correlation coefficients Hypothesis testing Confidence intervals Robustness Large sample theory Jackknife
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. R. Wilcox Detecting Nonlinear Associations, Plus Comments on Testing Hypotheses About the Correlation Coefficient Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2001; 26(1): 73 - 83. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Caruso and N. Cliff Empirical Size, Coverage, and Power of Confidence Intervals for Spearman's Rho Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 1997; 57(4): 637 - 654. [Abstract] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Fowler Power and Robustness in Product-Moment Correlation Applied Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1987; 11(4): 419 - 428. [Abstract] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Kraemer Robustness of the Distribution Theory of the Propuct Moment Correlation Coefficient Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 1980; 5(2): 115 - 128. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||


