Skip Navigation

Biometrika 1963 50(3-4):353-373; doi:10.1093/biomet/50.3-4.353
© 1963 by Biometrika Trust
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HEXT, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The estimation of second-order tensors, with related tests and designs{dagger}

GEORGE R. HEXT {ddagger}

The Statistical Laboratory, University of Cambridge

The tensors considered in this paper are the linear relationships between certain pairs of physical vector quantities which may be described by 3 x 3 symmetric matrices. Such a linear relationship may well vary from point to point in a non-homogeneous medium. From measurements at a given point in the medium, the least squares estimates of the components of the tensor at that point are obtained; from these the tensor's principal axes may be estimated. On the assumption that the errors of measurement are small and normally distributed, confidence intervals for the lengths of the principal axes are derived, together with confidence regions on the unit sphere for the directions of these axes.

Tests for equality of pairs of principal axes, for isotropy, and for comparing the tensors at two or more points are given.

In certain common experimental situations, a design for this work may be represented by a set of points on the unit sphere. If such a design is rotatable (Box & Hunter, 1957), the estimates have optimum properties, and the confidence intervals and regions take on particularly simple forms. Seven rotatable designs are given, which should cover most practical requirements.

These results are illustrated with a numerical example and diagram, taken from recent work on rock magnetism.

Finally, all the results are extended to more general symmetric matrices, and some further rotatable designs are given.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
B. O'Driscoll, C. T. E. Stevenson, and V. R. Troll
Mineral Lamination Development in Layered Gabbros of the British Palaeogene Igneous Province: A Combined Anisotropy of Magnetic Susceptibility, Quantitative Textural and Mineral Chemistry Study
J. Petrology, June 1, 2008; 49(6): 1187 - 1221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeosphereHome page
N. M. King, J. W. Hillhouse, S. Gromme, B. P. Hausback, and C. J. Pluhar
Stratigraphy, paleomagnetism, and anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of the Miocene Stanislaus Group, central Sierra Nevada and Sweetwater Mountains, California and Nevada
Geosphere, December 1, 2007; 3(6): 646 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
J. L. Bouchez, T. M. M. Nguema, L. Esteban, R. Siqueira, and R. Scrivener
The tourmaline-bearing granite pluton of Bodmin (Cornwall, UK): magnetic fabric study and regional inference
Journal of the Geological Society, July 1, 2006; 163(4): 607 - 616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
J. S. GEE, W. P. MEURER, P. A. SELKIN, and M. J. CHEADLE
Quantifying Three-Dimensional Silicate Fabrics in Cumulates Using Cumulative Distribution Functions
J. Petrology, October 1, 2004; 45(10): 1983 - 2009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
G. J. Borradaile and M. Jackson
Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS): magnetic petrofabrics of deformed rocks
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2004; 238(1): 299 - 360.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
Characterization of soft-sediment deformation: Detection of cryptoslumps using magnetic methods
Geology, March 1, 2003; 31(3): 203 - 206.




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.