© 1963 by Biometrika Trust
The estimation of second-order tensors, with related tests and designs

The Statistical Laboratory, University of Cambridge
The tensors considered in this paper are the linear relationships between certain pairs of physical vector quantities which may be described by 3 x 3 symmetric matrices. Such a linear relationship may well vary from point to point in a non-homogeneous medium. From measurements at a given point in the medium, the least squares estimates of the components of the tensor at that point are obtained; from these the tensor's principal axes may be estimated. On the assumption that the errors of measurement are small and normally distributed, confidence intervals for the lengths of the principal axes are derived, together with confidence regions on the unit sphere for the directions of these axes.
Tests for equality of pairs of principal axes, for isotropy, and for comparing the tensors at two or more points are given.
In certain common experimental situations, a design for this work may be represented by a set of points on the unit sphere. If such a design is rotatable (Box & Hunter, 1957), the estimates have optimum properties, and the confidence intervals and regions take on particularly simple forms. Seven rotatable designs are given, which should cover most practical requirements.
These results are illustrated with a numerical example and diagram, taken from recent work on rock magnetism.
Finally, all the results are extended to more general symmetric matrices, and some further rotatable designs are given.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. O'Driscoll, C. T. E. Stevenson, and V. R. Troll Mineral Lamination Development in Layered Gabbros of the British Palaeogene Igneous Province: A Combined Anisotropy of Magnetic Susceptibility, Quantitative Textural and Mineral Chemistry Study J. Petrology, June 1, 2008; 49(6): 1187 - 1221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. King, J. W. Hillhouse, S. Gromme, B. P. Hausback, and C. J. Pluhar Stratigraphy, paleomagnetism, and anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of the Miocene Stanislaus Group, central Sierra Nevada and Sweetwater Mountains, California and Nevada Geosphere, December 1, 2007; 3(6): 646 - 666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Bouchez, T. M. M. Nguema, L. Esteban, R. Siqueira, and R. Scrivener The tourmaline-bearing granite pluton of Bodmin (Cornwall, UK): magnetic fabric study and regional inference Journal of the Geological Society, July 1, 2006; 163(4): 607 - 616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. GEE, W. P. MEURER, P. A. SELKIN, and M. J. CHEADLE Quantifying Three-Dimensional Silicate Fabrics in Cumulates Using Cumulative Distribution Functions J. Petrology, October 1, 2004; 45(10): 1983 - 2009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Borradaile and M. Jackson Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS): magnetic petrofabrics of deformed rocks Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2004; 238(1): 299 - 360. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Characterization of soft-sediment deformation: Detection of cryptoslumps using magnetic methods Geology, March 1, 2003; 31(3): 203 - 206. |
||||




